
http://www.kuenselonline.com/2010/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=19612
Anti Corruption Commission officials have posted online the  list of officials, along with their names, who have failed to declare  their assets, including those that did after the deadline of March 31  (see table).
Commission officials, in an earlier interview, had said late declaration of assets was as good as not declaring them.If the commission was to go by the Act, commission officials said, the penalty was either impeachment or removal from office.
As one member of Parliament observed, to which some commission officials also agreed, the penalty was disproportionate.
Therefore, for the time being, a letter was written to the ethics  committee of each agency to act against, or reprimand their employees,  who failed to file in their asset declaration, or did so after the  deadline.
“The anti corruption bill, which specifies a penalty and monetary  fine such defaulters are liable for, is being revised at the  Parliament,” a commission official said.
In an earlier interview, commission officials had said they received  intimation letters from authorities concerned, on actions they took  against employees, who failed to declare their assets.
The purpose of emphasising on asset declaration, commission officials  said, was because it demanded greater public accountability from public  servants, the custodians of public resources.
As of 31 March 2011, 327 of 471 schedule I public servants  declared  their assets on time, bringing the compliance rate to 69.43% as against  86.86% for the year 2009.
The commission’s annual report, 2010, stated the trend of asset  declaration was still poor, because of non-existence of asset  declaration administrators in most agencies.
Besides, it was also because of weak management of agencies and the  commission’s non-enforcement of asset declaration rules that demand  impeachment or removal of non-declarants from their office.
As of April 2011, 13,955 non-schedule I public servants have declared their assets online, as compared with 4,644 in 2009.
By Samten Wangchuk
 
No comments:
Post a Comment